As if the economic meltdown, the dog-and-pony shows from
Detroit and Wall Street, and the Federal Government’s ham-handed attempts to
regain control over the nation’s finances were not bad enough: Former NASDAQ
chairman and respected money manager Bernard L.
Madoff, has for years been running what is possibly the largest Ponzi scheme
ever--$50 billion. When I read about it, I was not surprised. Madoff’s crime was merely one of
the various crimes and crises that have afflicted Wall Street over the last
decade. It was not the first to come to light and I promise you, it will not be
the last.
The SEC Surprise
What was a surprise was a story
on Yahoo News that reported:
On Tuesday night, [Securities
and Exchange Commission] SEC Chairman Christopher Cox ordered an internal
investigation of what went wrong and offered a scathing critique of the conduct
of his staff attorneys. He said they never bothered to seek a formal
commission-approved investigation that would have forced Madoff to surrender
vital information under subpoena. Instead, the staff relied on information
voluntarily produced by Madoff and his firm.
Credible and specific
allegations regarding Madoff's financial wrongdoing going back to at least 1999
were repeatedly brought to the attention of SEC staff, said Cox.
The story also reports that one of the SEC attorney’s that
were tasked with looking into Madoff’s activities from 1999 to 2004 was
recently married to Madoff’s daughter.
Just as other Federal agencies—not to mention Congress and
the White House—failed to head-off the any of the financial crises facing us
now (especially since they did so much to create the problem in the first
place), the SEC failed to deal with one old Wall Street guy and his Ponzi
scheme. That the SEC failed in so elementary a task and for so many years has
little or nothing to do with incompetence on the part of those who should have
been protecting investors from predators like Madoff. These SEC attorneys were
not stupid and the case did not “fall through the cracks.” To imagine that the
attorneys were stupid, or that the case did, indeed, slip through a crack,
would presuppose a variety of other circumstances that would likewise have to
be proven correct for them to be true. Since—regardless of what politicians
would have you believe—the simple answer is usually the right one, it will most
likely come out that these people simply looked the other way.
Who Trusts the
Government?
So, as if we needed less
confidence in the Federal Government, this really does beg the question of who
can be trusted.
We don’t trust the Congress, we don’t trust the White House,
we barely trust the courts (but they certainly rate higher than the other
branches of government). Illinois government
at all levels is an ocean of corruption, with Chicago being the drop-off at the edge of the
continental shelf, but other states localities are catching up. It is as if the
financial crisis has served to reveal the dark underside of American government
and everything that has been festering there for years. Even Obama, who was
swept to office on a message of change, has been touched by his association
with members of the Illinois Democratic Machine. Only time will tell if that
touch turns to a taint.
The Bottom Line
Like it or not, government is a teacher of values. For good
or ill, what the government does, people do. Recently, we have learned that you
can drive a company to ruin and that pain will be taken away by taxpayer money.
We have also learned that being is debt can’t stop you from doing what you
like. What has the SEC taught us? That if you have connections, you can run a
criminal enterprise and defraud people of millions.
These sorts of lessons have got to stop.
Newt Gingrich said it best when he remarked that big
government means big corruption. That is what we have, big government, and now
we are dealing with the results. If we are going to have trust in our
government again, if Obama really wants to stand apart as a clean, uncorrupted
politician, there must be a general housecleaning in our government and truly
strict anti-corruption measures need to be adopted.
If the new President does not act and set an agenda that
really does clean up government in this country, restoring these agencies to
their original mandate to protect the people, then the quote from Juvenal’s Satires (taken over by a popular
comic book) may become very relevant indeed:
Quis custodiet ipsos
custodes?
Who is watching
the watchmen?
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to our free newsletter to receive future articles and information delivered directly to your email inbox.