The coverage of a plumber named Joe
Wurzelbacher and his encounter with presidential candidate Senator
Barack Obama, replete with the Senator's admission that he plans to
“spread the wealth” has been remarkable, but after last night
that little discussion has been elevated to a real campaign issue.
Yes, folks, Joe the Plumber, a man who wishes to purchase the
business he has worked for all these years, now has a role in the
2008 presidential race, playing the same role that Willie Horton
played during the Bush-Dukakis race back in 1988: As a window into
the real views and positions of the Democratic presidential
candidate.
Back in 1988, the hot issue of the
election was crime. Dukakis touted his criminal justice efforts as
unqualified successes. Willie Horton actually came up as an issue in
the Democratic primaries. He was a sadistic murderer who cut up a
17-year old boy working the counter at a convenience store. The kid,
Joey Fournier, gave Horton all the money and was then stabbed 19
times. Horton then stuffed his body into a garbage can. He was
arrested, convicted and sentenced to life in prison without parole,
the maximum sentence in Massachusetts. He was then allowed to enjoy
weekend furloughs from prison. He came back nine times, but on the
tenth he crossed over into Maryland and attacked a couple in their
home, subjecting them to a 12-hour rape and torture experience before
stealing their car. He was caught and convicted and sentenced in
Maryland to two consecutive life terms plus 85 years. The sentencing
judge, Vincent J. Femia, refused to return Horton to Massachusetts,
saying, "I'm not prepared to take the chance that Mr. Horton
might again be furloughed or otherwise released. This man should
never draw a breath of free air again."
The fact that Dukakis, card-carrying
member of the ACLU, would permit the weekend release of a violent
murderer sentenced to life in prison without parole became a major
campaign issue and helped to sink the Governor's presidential bid in
spite of the incessant cries of “racism” from the Democrats.
America understood very well that the issue had nothing to do with
race. It was about releasing violent criminals, who should have never
drawn a free breath again, so they could prey on the innocent once
again.
Now, twenty years later, the problem
isn't crime, it is the economy. We have Joe the Plumber and yet
another window into the heart and mind of the democratic candidate
for president, a regular guy who just might get across the message
that raising taxes small businesses—raising taxes on anyone for
that matter—is, as he put it, “completely wrong.”
Appearing on Nightline, Joe told Terry
Moran, "To be honest with you, that infuriates me. It's not
right for someone to decide you made too much---that you've done too
good and now we're going to take some of it back." Joe went on
to say that, “If you worked for it, if it was your idea, and you
implemented it, it's not right for someone to decide you made too
much."
During their encounter, Obama had told
Joe that he planned to raise taxes on those making over $200,000 per
year in order to “spread the wealth around,” which has proven to
be the focal point of a great deal of richly deserved criticism. It
also begs the following question: What is the purpose of taxes? Do we
pay taxes to pay for necessary government services, or do we pay
taxes to redistribute wealth? Apparently, Obama thinks that
redistributing wealth is every bit as important as paying for
necessary government services.
That seems to be the part that is
drawing most of Joe's ire. He rightly points out that he is already
overtaxed and that anything more would hurt is ability to purchase
the business he is trying to buy. Obama's concern was for those
behind Joe. During the debate, he said that Joe should have had his
tax cut five years ago. He did. It was Bush's 2003 tax cut, which the
Democrats violently opposed, doing their best to limit it in every
way they could.
After that performance, should we
really look to the Democrats for small business support? Their
philosophy seems to have far more in common with Karl Marx than it
does with Adam Smith a fact made obvious by Obama's little admission.
During good economic times, that would be bad enough; but we are not
in good economic times, are we? We are in a recession that is likely
to last a while, unemployment is at 6.1%, a tiny but highly vocal and
litigious segment of the population is doing its best to make sure
that energy prices stay high, we are sending billions of dollars
overseas of oil and other reasons and burrowing like mad to make up
the difference. If ever there was a time to work for prosperity, to
get the nation's economic engine going, that time is now.
Prosperity means that the chains are
taken off of the American economy and it is allowed to do its work.
Prosperity means that businesses are encouraged—I mean really
encouraged—to make money, to expand, to hire people; you know, to
prosper. Prosperity means giving everyone an equal chance, not
guaranteeing an equal outcome. It means all of these things, but one
thing prosperity does not mean is spreading the wealth around. In
fact, prosperity means taking the wealth you have earned and using it
to create more wealth.
In an article appearing on
MoneyNews.com,
Columbia University economist and Nobel Prize winner Robert Mundell,
says that ending the Bush tax cuts—as proposed by presumptive
Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama—would cause "a
big recession, a nosedive," while he called an abrupt tax
increase “lethal.”
According to Mundell, making the Bush
tax cuts permanent would eliminate economic uncertainty, which he
says is more important than pushing for a further cut in the income
tax rates." Mundell also advises lowering the top marginal tax
rates from 35% to 30% and cutting the corporate tax rate to 25% in
order to stimulate the economy and allow us to grow our way out of
the crisis we are in.
Joe the Plumber knows that well enough,
even without Ivy League degrees. He knows that higher taxes do not
lead to prosperity, they lead to stagnation and they lead to failure.
Small business owners all over America know the same thing, and they
know that the policies outlined by Senator Obama will harm them
terribly.
We have a choice in November, a
candidate that will harm small business or one that will support
small business; a candidate that will follow a Marxist approach to
the economy or one that wants American Free Market Capitalism to do
it work.
Choose wisely.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to our
free newsletter to receive future articles and information delivered directly to your email inbox.
