Does the Industry Really Want to End Computer Virus Attacks?

Posted by Charles M Cooper on Tuesday, May 13, 2008

OK, show of hands: Who out there has spent loads of money on a nifty antivirus solution for their company—you know, the kind that makes all sorts of promises as to the safety you will enjoy, the effectiveness of their antiviral software, the fieriness of their firewall, so on and so forth—only to be infected a short time later? I think it is safe to say that most of us have been there, furiously trying to figure out how to clean the virus off our machines—a virus that our new super anti-viral solution can’t seem to handle—without having to reformat the hard drive, reinstall Windows and then reinstall everything else. The question is, why?

The answer, of course, is that antivirus solutions work in much the same way as medicinal vaccines: They only work on known viruses. In other words, a given antiviral solution will protect you against an old virus, something the solution has a definition for. That can be useful, since once a virus is “released into the wild” it can linger on the Internet for years, posing a potential hazard for new machines coming online. The real hazard comes from the viruses that are being released today, viruses that have not been isolated, studied and defined.

The Failure of Traditional Antiviral Solutions

Antiviral software began its rise to prominence back in 1993, when viruses were passed from one computer to another via infected floppy discs. With the advent of the Internet to general use in 1995, the development of virus forums and kits, spyware and adware, worms and trojans; and the move from viruses being experiments or vandalism to being a big-money criminal activity, the scene has changed dramatically. Now, 15 years later, the traditional antiviral approaches are simply not effective. They just can’t keep up.

Yet we rely on this technology, always hoping that this latest version will do the trick and yet, more frequently than we’d like to think, that latest version fails. It has to fail, the odds are simply overwhelming. In 1989 there were about 30 known viruses, today there are over 200,000 with more coming online every day. To make matters worse, new viruses are tested against the latest antiviral software to make sure it can get through. Not all of them, perhaps, but certainly the major ones like Norton and MacAfee.

Given that the approach of antiviral solutions has traditionally been to close the barn door after the horse escapes, it makes sense to try an alternative way of dealing with the problem that closes the door before the horse gets out.

The Alternative: Whitelisting

The traditional antiviral (and anti-malware solutions in general) approach is to blacklist suspicious programs and keep them from working. In other words, it is supposed to identify and kill the virus. As we have seen, this only works when the solution can see the virus for what it is, a fact that leads to a high failure rate.

To address this shortcoming, a switch should be made from blacklisting suspicious software to whitelisting trusted software. In this scenario, new programs (and viruses and other malware are programs) are either entirely prohibited from operating or are placed in quarantine until they are considered trustworthy. By maintaining a strict whitelisting strategy, you could easily reduce your malware threat to next to nothing.

Lumension Security came up with this in 2000, when it became clear to them that no matter what antiviral solutions businesses were using, they were still being hit by viral attacks in ever increasing numbers. Designed to protect networks, their Sanctuary Application and Device Control suites, which were previewed at the 2004 InfoSecurity tradeshow, are proven, end-point security solutions that control both applications and peripheral devices through the use of whitelists.

Sanctuary operates by calculating a cryptographic hash for each approved executable file. This 20-byte signature, generated using the state-of-the-art SHA-1 algorithm, serves to identify the file itself instead of weaker attributes such as a file name or date. Each and every time a user wishes to open an executable, Sanctuary performs an instantaneous signature check on the file to ensure its authenticity. If even one bit is incorrect, the file will not be allowed to automatically execute.

That means a file piggy-backed to an e-mail or smuggled in on a downloaded image from a website will be prevented from running since it is not on the whitelist of acceptable applications. It also means that the sales manager’s teenage son can’t install something he downloaded onto his mother’s computer or plug an unauthorized peripheral device into the machine. This enhanced end-point security and IT policy enforcement are two additional reasons why whitelisting technology is something to consider.

The Weakest Link: People

The sad truth is that the majority of data losses come from within the company firewall, from employees. This isn’t a big surprise; it has long been known that people are the weakest link in any security-related situation. According to the FBI, 15% of people are totally dishonest, 5% are totally honest and the rest fall somewhere in between. Honesty, however, does not always translate into responsible, much less intelligent. Yep, people do foolish and irresponsible things.

From an IT security point of view, these foolish and irresponsible things are usually done in complete innocence. They include downloading unapproved software or installing such software from a disc, plugging strange devices, such as a USB thumb drive, into their computer, just to see what it is; and other, similar activities. By employing a whitelist solution that covers both hardware and software, you mitigate problems caused by well-meaning but irresponsible employee activities.

It will also protect against those with a plot to steal information. If an intruder, whether they come from within your company or from the outside, cannot plug in the media they brought to copy data—thumb drives are the most often implicated technology here—then they cannot easily steal the data. True, there are other ways of stealing data but none that leave so little evidence.

The Bottom Line

Considering the amount of money that is lost to malware and physical data loss each year, it makes sense to get serious about getting rid of this kind of threat once and for all and protect yourself with technology that does not have to play catch-up with the malware it promises to stop. Whitelisting, as demonstrated by Lumension, is a very effective way to accomplish this and an approach you should consider for your business.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to our free newsletter to receive future articles and information delivered directly to your email inbox.

Charles M Cooper

Charles Cooper is the Web Editor for America’s Best Companies. He came to ABC with nearly twenty years of business and technology writing and editorial experience. In addition to ABC, Charles has been tapped to be a freelance business writer with the upcoming American edition of The China Daily, has served as a writer for HowStuffWorks.com and LovetoKnow.com and as senior editor for Gear Technology magazine. Contact Charles.

Tags: computer virus, internet

Print this Article Print Email this Article Email Print this Article Comments
 
RSS RSS Feed Stumble Stumble del.icio.us del.icio.us Reddit Reddit Digg Digg Tip'd Yahoo! Buzz

Related Articles

Add a Comment


Name Email Address
Website

Identify yourself Required, never displayed Optional
 
 


 
Verify You're Human
 


ADP 468x60

Reader Comments


Tuesday, May 13, 2008 at 6:51 PM
Down With Anti Virus Software! says:

I have always been a big fan of not using any sort of virus protection.

I think the virus software developers are the same people that make the viruses.

No viruses = No Virus Protection Software Developers anymore.

I think that businesses and bigger network servers need this in place for obvious reasons... for my home computer, Norton will never catch me!

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 at 2:02 PM
James Moggins says:

So is it a good idea for a person who has a lot of information on their laptop to repurchase Norton when the free rial ends. And also is there a website where i can get virus protection for free?

Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 1:17 PM
dgxshiny says:

I have never had a virus program that convinced me that it was protecting me from viruses. There are two free ones that many people find more effective than Norton.

AVG: http://free.grisoft.com/
Avast: http://www.avast.com/

The best thing that I recommend to most is to download FireFox. IE6 and below have so many security vulnerabilities that get exploited all the time. Using a faster and safer browser eliminates 90% of the threats up front (also free).

http://www.getfirefox.com

Thursday, May 15, 2008 at 3:52 PM
Anti-Norton says:

Thanks, i'll probably look into that tonight. I've never used firefox before so i will be kind of weary of getting into that.

Monday, May 19, 2008 at 3:03 PM
anonymous says:

AVG > avast!

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 5:15 PM
dust4ngel says:

there are two major problems with whitelisting as i see it.

1. it would be too effective. without perpetual antivirus software failure, there is no reason for users to pay for upgraded versions.

2. it would not be hardware-expensive enough. with typical antivirus software checking literally every file, and often every file operation, computers run at hideously slow speeds - this creates necessary demand for faster and higher-capacity hardware to cope with this wastefulness.

so in short, no - the industry does not want to end computer virus attacks.

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 5:31 PM
Anonymous says:

The problem with that is that people would just override it every time it said something was wrong, people are too stupid to listen, they would say, "Well of course that program is trying to run, I installed it, it must be new and not on the whitelist." Second, never ever pay for Antivirus, as you said they are all fail anyway, use avast or AVG, I use avast in the rare instances that I am actually using windows. Three use Linux, no viruses and you need root privileges to do anything that could harm your computer. (also all the people who make viruses use it so there is a sort of unofficial armistice on Linux viruses, I won't infect you if you don't infect me.

Monday, November 10, 2008 at 5:41 PM
MacGyver says:

White listing "good" programs would alleviate a lot of problems on two fronts. The internal and external. The primary internal front is user error. I don't know how many times I've had to go through all the processes on my computer using a guide trying to isolate the one that is malicious simply because some fuck-tard that can't get a real job coding has a superiority complex. In short the idea sounds great however...the down side...you get things like Vista...now it sounds good now but with the whitelisting operation of vista...fuck me where's my XP disc?

Friday, February 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM
jocel says:

this article gives me idea about my rush research paper, bu tdont worry i didnt copy paste it,

Friday, June 05, 2009 at 3:01 AM
club penguin says:

Is it a good idea for a person who has a lot of information on their laptop to repurchase Norton when the free rial ends. And also is there a website where i can get virus protection for free?

Friday, June 05, 2009 at 9:41 AM
Kim Fenolio says:

Actually there are some pretty decent free anti virus software programs out there. You can try <a href="http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html" target="_blank">Avast</a> or <a href="http://free.avg.com/download-avg-anti-virus-free-edition" target="_blank">AVG</a>.

The paid programs give you more in depth scheduling than these free versions do, but as long as you're approaching the internet with a bit of common sense it isn't completely necessary to pay.


Join Free Today

Email:    Password: | Register | Help